Estuary habitat associations for juvenile Pacific salmon and pelagic fish: Implications for coastal planning processes
Back to previous page
| Authors: | Sharpe, C; Carr-Harris, C; Arbeider, M; Wilson, SM; Moore, JW |
| Year: | 2019 |
| Journal: | Aquat. Conserv.-Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 29: 1636-1656 Article Link (DOI) |
| Title: | Estuary habitat associations for juvenile Pacific salmon and pelagic fish: Implications for coastal planning processes |
| Abstract: | Assessment of risk from industrial developments often relies on simple habitat descriptions for focal species. However, simple habitat metrics may not be accurate predictors of locations that species actually use. Understanding the nature of habitat is particularly pressing for estuaries, as they are among the most degraded ecosystems globally but provide critical rearing habitat for many species, including Pacific salmon. Canadian environmental impact assessment approaches use simple habitat-type models to assess risk from developments and assume that different species of salmon rely on the same habitat. This study asked what combination of habitat type and biophysical covariates best predicted use of estuary habitat by juvenile salmon and two dominant small pelagic fish. Fish were sampled via purse seine throughout the Skeena River estuary (British Columbia, Canada) for 2 years across different habitat types (eelgrass, open water, sandy banks, and rocky shores). Simple habitat-type models were compared with models with more complex biophysical variables to predict the variability in relative abundance of juvenile Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch), and sockeye (Oncorhynchus nerka) salmon, along with pelagic fish species Pacific herring (Clupea pallasii) and surf smelt (Hypomesus pretiosus). The combination of variables that best predicted abundance differed across fish species. Pelagic fish were associated with near-shore sites, increased temperature (herring), and increased salinity (smelt). Juvenile coho and sockeye salmon (but not Chinook), were more abundant in higher turbid waters. Chinook and sockeye salmon used eelgrass habitat more frequently than other habitat types, whereas coho salmon were more abundant in areas with high macroalgae cover. Models with these variables had greater predictive power than those using habitat type alone for juvenile salmon. Simple classifications of estuary habitat currently used in environmental risk assessment may not reflect the complex nature of fish-habitat associations. Understanding biophysical factors associated with estuary fish abundance can inform management of estuary habitat to support their nursery function for important fish. |
Please send suggestions for improving this publication database to
sass-support@sfu.ca.
Departmental members may update their publication list.