The evolutionary relationships and age of Homo naledi: An assessment using dated Bayesian phylogenetic methods
Back to previous page
| Authors: | Dembo, M; Radovcic, D; Garvin, HM; Laird, ME; Schroeder, L; Scott, JE; Brophy, J; Ackermann, RR; Musiba, CM; de Ruiter, DJ; Mooers, AO; Collard, M |
| Year: | 2016 |
| Journal: | Journal of Human Evolution 97: 17-26 Article Link (DOI) |
| Title: | The evolutionary relationships and age of Homo naledi: An assessment using dated Bayesian phylogenetic methods |
| Abstract: | Homo naledi is a recently discovered species of fossil hominin from South Africa. A considerable amount is already known about H. naledi but some important questions remain unanswered. Here we report a study that addressed two of them: "Where does H. naledi fit in the hominin evolutionary tree?" and "How old is it?" We used a large supermatrix of craniodental characters for both early and late hominin species and Bayesian phylogenetic techniques to carry out three analyses. First, we performed a dated Bayesian analysis to generate estimates of the evolutionary relationships of fossil hominins including H. naledi. Then we employed Bayes factor tests to compare the strength of support for hypotheses about the relationships of H. naledi suggested by the best-estimate trees. Lastly, we carried out a resampling analysis to assess the accuracy of the age estimate for H. naledi yielded by the dated Bayesian analysis. The analyses strongly supported the hypothesis that H. naledi forms a Glade with the other Homo species and Australopithecus sediba. The analyses were more ambiguous regarding the position of H. naledi within the (Homo, Au. sediba) Glade. A number of hypotheses were rejected, but several others were not. Based on the available craniodental data, Homo antecessor, Asian Homo erectus, Homo habilis, Homo floresiensis, Homo sapiens, and Au. sediba could all be the sister taxon of H. naledi. According to the dated Bayesian analysis, the most likely age for H. naledi is 912 ka. This age estimate was supported by the resampling analysis. Our findings have a number of implications. Most notably, they support the assignment of the new specimens to Homo, cast doubt on the claim that H. naledi is simply a variant of H. erectus, and suggest H. naledi is younger than has been previously proposed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Please send suggestions for improving this publication database to
sass-support@sfu.ca.
Departmental members may update their publication list.